Cognition has components...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f42a/2f42a6cfca1a434060d24369f3953176d017f43d" alt=""
Some components of cognition have smaller, nested components...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a745/5a745bf8375b5c38dbacb5c3ea4d2953c8950aa5" alt=""
The components of cognition are linked...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec7f4/ec7f489f47a48d1186fd8a7eb218ec375e598878" alt=""
Nested components of cognition are linked...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d09b/9d09bdfe2294f49ec018246f2b83adea72bf221b" alt=""
The activity of and relationships among components of cognition are not fully deterministic...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98505/98505b59629d8d7699451dd388e53f3c42920e14" alt=""
Your feedback is most welcome. I've touched on some of the ways I think this model (stochastic scale-free coordination class) can be supported by experience in the classroom, such as concepts within concepts and student questions that seem "random". What other aspects of cognition and learning do you think this model can support? What aspects of cognition and learning have only limited, if any, representation within this model?